Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Selecting Quality Journals for Academic Publishing: Select Bibliography

This guide supports the Predatory Publishing workshop on the Lehman College Campus (February 26, 2016). Access the video of the Workshop via the Workshop Tab/Page.

Select Bibliography on the Topics of Selecting Quality Journals for Academic Publishing & Predatory Journals

Ball, A., & Duke, M. (2015). How to track the impact of research data with metrics. DCC How-to Guides. Retrieved from

Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489(7415), 179. doi:10.1038/489179a

Beaubien, S., & Eckard, M. (2014). Addressing faculty publishing concerns with open access journal quality indicators. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2(2). doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1133

Berger, M., & Cirasella, J. (2015). Beyond Beall’s List: Better understanding predatory publishers. College & Research Libraries News, 76(3), 132-135. doi:

Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2015). Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts? Journal of Informetrics, 9(2), 408-418. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2015.01.006

Haddawy, P., Hassan, S., Asghar, A., & Amin, S. (2016). A comprehensive examination of the relation of three citation-based journal metrics to expert judgment of journal quality. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 162-173. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.005

Harzing, A., & Wal, R. V. (2009). A Google Scholar h-index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 41-46. doi:10.1002/asi.20953

Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., Rijcke, S. D., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429-431. doi:10.1038/520429a

LSE (2014, July 30). The impact factor and Its discontents: Reading list on controversies and shortcomings of the journal impact factor. [Web log post]. Retrieved from

               Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Cobey, K.D., Lalu, M. M., Galipeau, J., Avey, M.T.,…Zia, H. (2017).  Stop this waste of people, animals and money.  Nature, 549(7670), 23-25.

Seiler, C., & Wohlrabe, K. (2014). How robust are journal rankings based on the impact factor? Evidence from the economic sciences. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 904-911. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.001

Shen, C., & Björk, B. (2015). “Predatory” open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine BMC Med, 13(1). doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2

Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “ predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406-1417. doi:10.1002/asi.23265

                                                                                                                                               prepared February, 2016

                                                                                                                                               last updated February 2018